Social choice without the Pareto principle under weak independence
نویسندگان
چکیده
We show that the class of social welfare functions that satisfy a weak independence condition identi ed by Baigent (1987) is fairly rich and freed of a power concentration on a single individual. This positive result prevails when a weak pareto condition is imposed. Hence, under weak independence, both the Arrow (1951) and Wilson (1972) theorems vanish. We thank Goksel Asan, Irem Bozbay, Tugce Cuhadaroglu, Gilbert La¤ond, Jean Laine, Ipek Ozkal-Sanver and Ozer Selcuk for their constructive suggestions. Our research is part of a project entitled Social Perception A Social Choice Perspective, supported by Istanbul Bilgi University Research Fund. Remzi Sanver acknowledges the support of the Turkish Academy of Sciences Distinguished Young Scientist Award Program (TUBAGEBIP). Of course, the authors are responsible from all possible errors.
منابع مشابه
Some Results for Impossibility Theorems of Social Welfare Function and Social Choice Function
We present some results on social welfare function and social choice function. First, we replace weak Pareto principle of Arrow’s axioms with strong Pareto principle, and then show that assuming unrestricted domain property, independence of irrelevant alternatives and strong Pareto principle on a social welfare function in Arrow’s sense leads to the existence of first to nth commanders whose st...
متن کاملComplete characterization of functions satisfying the conditions of Arrow's theorem
Arrow’s theorem implies that a social welfare function satisfying Transitivity, the Weak Pareto Principle (Unanimity) and Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) must be dictatorial. When non-strict preferences are also allowed, a dictatorial social welfare function is defined as a function for which there exists a single voter whose strict preferences are followed. This definition allows...
متن کاملA topological approach to the Arrow impossibility theorem when individual preferences are weak orders
We will present a topological approach to the Arrow impossibility theorem of social choice theory that there exists no binary social choice rule (which we will call a social welfare function) which satisfies the conditions of transitivity, independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA), Pareto principle and non-existence of dictator. Our research is in line with the studies of topological approa...
متن کاملA generalization of Campbell and Kelly's trade-off theorem
This paper considers social choice theory without the Pareto principle. We revisit the trade-off theorem developed by Campbell and Kelly (Econometrica 61:1355– 1365, 1993), and generalize their result. By introducing an alternative criterion of power structure, a dominance relation, we show that if a social welfare function on the unrestricted domain satisfies the independence of irrelevant alt...
متن کاملOn the topological equivalence of the Arrow impossibility theorem and Amartya Sen's liberal paradox
We will show that the Arrow impossibility theorem for binary social choice rules that there exists no binary social choice rule which satisfies transitivity, Pareto principle, independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA), and has no dictator, and Amartya Sen’s liberal paradox for binary social choice rules that there exists no binary social choice rule which satisfies acyclicity, Pareto princi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 43 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014